Member
$245
Nonmember
$325
Event Date Event Time Registration Deadline Registration
September 30, 2026 9:00 am - 1:00 pm Register Today

The fixed period of admission is replacing duration of status for F, J, and I nonimmigrants. The questions have shifted from what the rule says to what it does: how admit-until dates are appearing on I-94s, how extension filings are moving through USCIS, and where advising processes and institutional policies are changing.

This four-hour practice forum brings practitioners together to compare early implementation experience across institutional types. A short description of the rule as in force and on observed field practice is followed by a panel of institutions reporting what broke and what held, then table discussions focusing on key topics such as: the "admit until date" (AUD), program extension v. extension of stay with USCIS, travel and reentry, transition topics, employment topics, F-1 academic restrictions, deadlines driving the work, and J-1 topics. Institutions of various types should benefit: doctoral, comprehensive, baccalaureate, community college, intensive English, and exchange sponsors.

The practice forum is not intended to answer every question about the D/S rule and address every complicated scenario resulting from the rule but will offer approaches to implementation of the rule.  We also want to hear about your approaches, successes, and challenges.  The focus is practical take-aways.

Bring one observation from your own campus. This is a working session, not a briefing. 

Learning objectives

After participating in this forum, attendees will be able to:

  1. Distinguish the requirements applying to the transition cohort from those who enter or reenter the United States (or otherwise are issued a date-specific AUD on their Form I-94) on or after the final rule effective date, and identify which campus populations fall into each.
  2. Evaluate their institution's procedural workflows (e.g., program extensions, transfers, change of level, employment and practical training, travel authorizations) against observed field practice, locating the points where timing failures or failure to understand the new processes put student/exchange visitor status or work authorization at risk.
  3. Develop an advising and communication plan for rule-based deadlines and winter break travel, calibrated to their institution type and staffing capacity.

Co-sponsored by The George Washington University

Location: The George Washington University, Milken Institute School of Public Health

David Fosnocht

Image
david_fosnocht_100x140.jpg
NAFSA: Association of International Educators
David Fosnocht, JD, is director of immigration practice resources at NAFSA: Association of International Educators, and editor of the NAFSA Adviser’s Manual. Before joining the NAFSA staff, he was a NAFSA member and associate director of the International Services Office at George Washington...

Steve Springer

Image
Steve Springer
NAFSA: Association of International Educators
Steve Springer, JD, is director of regulatory practice liaison for NAFSA: Association of International Educators and manages NAFSA’s engagement with federal agencies concerning regulatory practice issues, among other duties. Prior to joining the NAFSA staff he worked as an immigration attorney...