Updates:

  • On March 14, 2020, USCIS placed a Coronavirus alert on its public charge page, that begins: "USCIS encourages all those, including aliens, with symptoms that resemble Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) (fever, cough, shortness of breath) to seek necessary medical treatment or preventive services. Such treatment or preventive services will not negatively affect any alien as part of a future Public Charge analysis."
  • Agency announcements of February 24, 2020 implementation of public charge rules and forms:
    • USCIS announced that it implemented its public charge rule on February 24, 2020 in all states, including Illinois. USCIS has updated its Policy Manual at Volume 8 Part G (Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility) and Volume 2 Part A Chapter 4 (Extension of Stay and Change of Status)
    • DOS announced that implemented its own public charge form and rule on February 24, 2020. DOS updated its Foreign Affairs Manual at 9 FAM 302.8 to instruct consular officers on how to apply the DOS public charge rule to applicants for nonimmigrant and immigrant visas. DOS also released a new form DS-5540 Public Charge Questionnaire to collect relevant information from applicants for immigrant visas and, in certain circumstances, applicants for nonimmigrant visas.
  • On January 27, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court lifted an October 11, 2019 nationwide preliminary injunction that was preventing the administration from enforcing its public charge rule, except for Illinois. On February 21, 2020, the Supreme Court also lifted the preliminary injunction in Illinois, the final state where a preliminary injunction was still in effect. DHS is now permitted to implement and enforce its public charge rule nationwide on February 24, 2020.

New Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Department of State (DOS) public charge regulations were originally scheduled to go into effect on October 15, 2019. A preliminary injunction issued by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and other district courts halted enforcement of the DHS rule. On January 27, 2020 and February 21, 2020, however, the U.S. Supreme Court lifted the injunctions in 5-4 votes, allowing DHS to enforce its rule nationwide. USCIS announced that it implemented its Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds final rule on February 24, 2020. DOS also announced that it implemented its own public charge form and rule on February 24, 2020.

The new rules require DHS and DOS to consider the totality of the circumstances and make a prospective, forward-looking determination of whether applicants for an immigrant or nonimmigrant visa, applicants for admission to the United States, and applicants for adjustment of status to lawful permanent residence are likely to become a public charge "at any time" in the future. The DHS regulation also introduces a related (but different) public benefits condition for change of status (COS) and extension of stay (EOS) nonimmigrant applicants, who will have to demonstrate that "since obtaining the nonimmigrant status" they seek to extend or change, until the date USCIS adjudicates the COS or EOS application, they have not received one or more of the listed public benefits over the designated duration threshold."

DHS and DOS will generally only consider public benefits received on or after February 24, 2020 for petitions or applications postmarked on or after that date.

Read the rules

Background

A long-standing Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) public charge provision establishes that applicants for a visa, admission, or adjustment of status are inadmissible to the United States if they are likely at any time to become a public charge. INA 212(a)(4), 8 USC 1182(a)(4) provides in general that,

"Any alien who, in the opinion of the consular officer at the time of application for a visa, or in the opinion of the Attorney General at the time of application for admission or adjustment of status, is likely at any time to become a public charge is inadmissible."

The statute then directs DOS and DHS to consider at a minimum the following factors when making a public charge determination:

  • age,
  • health,
  • family status,
  • assets, resources, and financial status, and
  • education and skills.

However, the statute does not define "public charge," or provide any detail about how "age, health, family status, assets, resources, and financial status, and education and skills" should be considered in determining the likelihood of someone becoming a public charge "at any time" in the future. The DHS and DOS regulations provide these definitions, narrowing and superseding prior agency guidance that has been in place since 1999. These regulations impact the following:

DOS regulations

  • Applicants for immigrant or nonimmigrant visas

DHS regulations

  • Applicants for adjustment of status filed on Form I-485. USCIS adjudicates adjustment of status applications. USCIS created a new form, Form I-944, Declaration of Self-Sufficiency, on which I-485 adjustment of status applicants will have to provide information to establish that they are not likely to become a public charge. The new public charge determination standards and Form I-944 will be required for adjustment of status applications postmarked on and after the effective date of the DHS final rule.
  • Applicants applying for admission to the United States as an immigrant or nonimmigrant. A CBP officer at a U.S. port of entry usually makes these decisions. Remember:
    • Nonimmigrants presenting themselves at a port of entry are always considered as applying for admission to the United States.
    • Lawful permanent residents returning to the United States after an absence of more than 6 months, are considered "applicants for admission," but permanent residents returning after an absence of 6 months or less are not.
  • Other individuals who are considered "applicants for admission," including individuals who entered the United States without inspection (EWI). Inadmissibility determinations in these cases are made by DHS officers, with the particular DHS bureau (CBP, ICE, USCIS) depending on the context of DHS's encounter with the individual.
  • Public benefits condition for COS and EOS applicants. The DHS regulation also introduces a related (but different) condition for change of status (COS) and extension of stay (EOS) nonimmigrant applicants, who will have to establish that "since obtaining the nonimmigrant status" they seek to extend or change, until the date USCIS adjudicates the COS or EOS application, they have not received one or more of the listed public benefits over the designated duration threshold."

While the DHS regulation effective date was on hold due to litigation, DHS continued to follow 1999 legacy Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) policy guidance published at 64 FR 28689 (May 26, 1999), which excluded from consideration non-cash benefits (other than institutionalization for long-term care) and special-purpose cash benefits not for income maintenance. Under INS's 1999 guidance, for example, receipt of food stamps was not considered in public charge determinations, because they are non-cash benefits. Effective February 24, 2020, the new DHS regulation supersedes the 1999 legacy INS guidance.

Since there are two agencies issuing regulations on the same statutory provision, DOS communicated at the outset that it intends to align its standards with DHS standards. In the preamble to its final rule at 84 FR 54996  (October 11, 2019) DOS states:

"This interim final rule reflects the Department's interpretation of the pertinent section of the INA as it applies to visa applicants. This rulemaking is also intended to align the Department's standards with those of the Department of Homeland Security, to avoid situations where a consular officer will evaluate an alien's circumstances and conclude that the alien is not likely at any time to become a public charge, only for the Department of Homeland Security to evaluate the same alien when he seeks admission to the United States on the visa issued by the Department of State and finds the alien inadmissible on public charge grounds under the same facts."

Forms Impacted by the Public Charge Rules

USCIS Forms

Revised versions of applications and petitions affected by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) final public charge rule must be used for all such forms postmarked on or after February 24, 2020. The revised forms and form instructions are now listed on each form's launch page. In a February 24, 2020 news release, USCIS stated:

"After today, USCIS will reject prior editions of affected forms, including in Illinois where the rule remained enjoined until Feb. 21, 2020, when the U.S. Supreme Court granted a stay of the statewide injunction. If USCIS receives an application or petition for immigration benefits using prior editions of the forms postmarked on or after Feb. 24, 2020, then USCIS will inform the applicant or petitioner of the need to submit a new application or petition using the correct forms. For applications and petitions that are sent by commercial courier (such as UPS, FedEx and DHL), the postmark date is the date reflected on the courier receipt."

USCIS forms launch pages have been updated with this notice:

"U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will implement the Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds final rule on Feb. 24, 2020... The final rule will apply only to applications and petitions postmarked (or if applicable, submitted electronically) on or after Feb. 24, 2020. For applications and petitions sent by commercial courier (such as UPS, FedEx, and DHL), the postmark date is the date reflected on the courier receipt. When determining whether an alien is likely to become a public charge at any time in the future, DHS will not consider an alien's application for, certification or approval to receive, or receipt of certain non-cash public benefits before Feb. 24, 2020. Similarly, when determining whether the public benefits condition applies to applications or petitions for extension of stay or change of status, USCIS will only consider public benefits received on or after Feb. 24, 2020."

Affected forms frequently used in the context of higher education include:

  • Form I-129 (H, L, O, TN, etc. petition) – revised version is dated 01/27/20
  • Form I-539 (application to extend/change nonimmigrant status) – revised version is dated 10/15/19
  • Form I-539A (co-applicants of I-539 principal applicants) – revised version is dated 10/15/19
  • Form I-485 (adjustment of status to permanent residence), including Supplements A and J – revised version is dated 10/15/19
    • USCIS also created a new form, Form I-944, Declaration of Self-Sufficiency, that many I-485 adjustment of status applicants will have to complete to provide information on receipt of public benefits to demonstrate that they are not inadmissible based on the public charge ground... Do NOT submit this form before Feb. 24, 2020."
  • Form I-912 (request for fee waiver) – revised version is dated 10/15/19. Instructions for the 10/15/19 edition of Form I-912 include guidance on how an approved fee waiver could affect the applicant's eligibility for future immigration benefits that are subject to the public charge ground of inadmissibility.

Revised USCIS forms available now

The revised edition date of the above forms is 10/15/19, except for Form I-129, whose revised edition date is 1/27/20. The revised form editions and form instructions are now on each form's launch page.

DOS Forms

DOS established a new form, DS-5540 Public Charge Questionnaire, to collect relevant information from applicants for immigrant visas and, in certain circumstances, applicants for nonimmigrant visas. DOS also updated its Foreign Affairs Manual at 9 FAM 302.8 on how consular officers will apply the DOS public charge rule to applicants for nonimmigrant and immigrant visas. The FAM notes that:

"The amount and type of evidence generally required in an IV case is much greater than that which is required in an NIV case. Your determination that an applicant qualifies for the NIV sought is generally sufficient to meet the requirements of INA 212(a)(4), absent evidence that gives you reason to believe that a public charge concern exists...."

and

"If the evidence of nonimmigrant status submitted does not indicate adequate provision for the applicant's support while in the United States and for the return abroad, you may request specific financial evidence and/or require the applicant complete a Form DS-5540, Public Charge Questionnaire, in whole or in part, to respond orally to questions from that form, or require a surety bond."

In a Federal Register notice published at 85 FR 8087 (February 12, 2020) DOS had also stated that it "seeks to align the Department's standards with those of the Department of Homeland Security, to avoid situations where a consular officer will evaluate an alien's circumstances and conclude that the alien is not likely at any time to become a public charge, only for the Department of Homeland Security to evaluate the same alien when he seeks admission to the United States on the visa issued by the Department of State and find the alien inadmissible on public charge grounds under the same facts."

Brief Overview

Definitions of Public Charge and Public Benefits under INA 212(a)(4)

The new DHS and DOS regulations redefine the terms and conditions of the public charge ground of inadmissibility established by INA 212(a)(4) [8 USC 1182(a)(4)].

Under the DHS rule at 8 CFR 212.21(a) and the DOS rule at 22 CFR 40.41(b), "public charge" means an alien who receives one or more public benefits, as defined at new 8 CFR 212.21(b) (DHS) or 8 CFR 40.41(c) (DOS), "for more than 12 months in the aggregate within any 36-month period (such that, for instance, receipt of two benefits in one month counts as two months)."

Note that the revised USCIS forms will also ask if the alien has received or is currently certified to receive (by the benefit-granting agency) any of these benefits. The forms will also ask for the date the alien started receiving the benefit, or if certified, the date the alien will start receiving the benefit, and the date the benefit ended or expires.

The public benefits listed at 8 CFR 212.21(b) and 22 CFR 40.41(c), receipt of which on or after February 24, 2020 will be counted towards this threshold, include the following. This is an exclusive list. Benefits other than these are not defined as public benefits for purposes of these rules.

  1. Any Federal, State, local, or tribal cash assistance for income maintenance (other than tax credits), including:
    • (i) Supplemental Security Income (SSI);
    • (ii) Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF); or
    • (iii) Federal, State or local cash benefit programs for income maintenance (often called "General Assistance" in the State context, but which also exist under other names);
  2. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) (commonly known as "food stamps");
  3. Section 8 Housing Assistance under the Housing Choice Voucher Program, as administered by HUD;
  4. Section 8 Project-Based Rental Assistance (including Moderate Rehabilitation) under Section 8 of the U.S. Housing Act of 1937;
  5. Medicaid under 42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq., except for:
    • (i) Benefits received for an emergency medical condition as described in 42 U.S.C. 1396b(v)(2)-(3), 42 CFR 440.255(c);
    • (ii) Services or benefits funded by Medicaid but provided under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA);
    • (iii) School-based services or benefits provided to individuals who are at or below the oldest age eligible for secondary education as determined under State or local law;
    • (iv) Benefits received by an alien under 21 years of age, or a woman during pregnancy (and during the 60-day period beginning on the last day of the pregnancy).
  6. Public Housing under section 9 of the U.S. Housing Act of 1937.

The Catholic Immigration Network's CLINIC has a good set of FAQs that explain the details of which benefits are and are not included under the DHS rule, and other mechanics and knowns and unknowns.

The DHS and DOS regulations also contain a very limited number of exceptions for certain groups and circumstances.

Some helpful clarifications from the preamble to the final rules:

DOS Intent to Align with DHS Interpretations

84 FR 54996  (October 11, 2019)

"This interim final rule reflects the Department's interpretation of the pertinent section of the INA as it applies to visa applicants. This rulemaking is also intended to align the Department's standards with those of the Department of Homeland Security, to avoid situations where a consular officer will evaluate an alien's circumstances and conclude that the alien is not likely at any time to become a public charge, only for the Department of Homeland Security to evaluate the same alien when he seeks admission to the United States on the visa issued by the Department of State and finds the alien inadmissible on public charge grounds under the same facts."

DHS on Receipt of Unemployment Insurance Payments Not Being Considered in Public Charge Determinations

84 FR 41292, 41390 (August 14, 2019)

"Consistent with the proposed rule, DHS will continue to exclude state, local, and tribal benefits that are not cash-benefits for these reasons. Further, DHS would not consider federal and state retirement, Social Security retirement benefits, Social Security Disability, postsecondary education, or unemployment benefits as public benefits under the public charge inadmissibility determination as these are considered to be earned benefits through the person's employment and specific tax deductions."

Application

The new DHS and DOS regulations govern three principal areas, in different ways:

  1. Public Benefits Condition. Nonimmigrants applying for change or extension of status must demonstrate that "since obtaining the nonimmigrant status" they seek to extend or change, until the date USCIS adjudicates the COS or EOS application, they have not received one or more of the listed public benefits for an aggregate of more than 12 months over the course of 3 years. This is known as the "public benefits condition," and is a different standard than a "public charge" determination.
  2. Public Charge Determination. Applicants for admission to the United States as well as applicants for adjustment of status must show that they are not likely at any time in the future to become a public charge, a more burdensome standard.
  3. Public Charge Determination. Applicants for nonimmigrant or immigrant visas must show that they are not likely at any time in the future to become a public charge, a more burdensome standard.

There are other changes of course, but we will focus in the above in this NAFSA resource.

Nonimmigrants Applying for COS or EOS - the Public Benefits Condition

The new DHS rule imposes a new condition on applicants for change or extension of nonimmigrant status to demonstrate that "since obtaining the nonimmigrant status" they seek to extend or change, until the date USCIS adjudicates the COS or EOS application, they have not received one or more of the listed public benefits over the designated duration threshold. DHS will only consider public benefits received on or after February 24, 2020 for petitions or applications postmarked on or after that date.

Although loosely referred to as a "public charge" determination, the inquiry for change of status and extension of stay applicants is not the full "totality of the circumstances" assessment of future likelihood of becoming a public charge that visa applicants, adjustment of status applicants, and applicants for admission at a port of entry are subjected to. Rather, it is a backward-looking inquiry to ascertain if the COS or EOS applicant actually received one of the specific public benefits "for more than 12 months in the aggregate within any 36-month period" since obtaining the nonimmigrant status that he or she seeks to extend, or from which he or she seeks to change. The COS/EOS standard, although it refers to the new definition of public charge, is a new standard introduced by DHS to get around the fact that COS/EOS applicants are statutorily not subject to the public charge ground of inadmissibility that applicants for a visa, admission, or adjustment are subject to. DHS notes in the preamble to the final rule: "Neither the NPRM nor this final rule is intended to apply the public charge ground of inadmissibility to extension of stay or change of status applicants. Instead, DHS is exercising its statutory authority to set a new condition for approval of extension of stay and change of status applications - that the applicant establish that the alien has not received since obtaining the nonimmigrant status he or she seeks to extend or from which he or she seeks to change, and through adjudication, one or more public benefits for more than 12 months in the aggregate within any 36-month period."

To accomplish this, the new rule amends the following core COS and EOS provisions:

8 CFR 248.1(a) - change of status

"(a) General. Except for those classes enumerated in § 248.2 of this part, any alien lawfully admitted to the United States as a nonimmigrant, including an alien who acquired such status in accordance with section 247 of the Act who is continuing to maintain his or her nonimmigrant status, may apply to have his or her nonimmigrant classification changed to any nonimmigrant classification other than that of a spouse or fiance(e), or the child of such alien, under section 101(a)(15)(K) of the Act or as an alien in transit under section 101(a)(15)(C) of the Act. Except where the nonimmigrant classification to which the alien seeks to change is exempted by law or regulation from section 212(a)(4) of the Act, as a condition for approval of a change of nonimmigrant status, the alien must demonstrate that he or she has not received since obtaining the nonimmigrant status from which he or she seeks to change, public benefits, as described in 8 CFR 212.21(b), for more than 12 months in the aggregate within any 36-month period (such that, for instance, receipt of two benefits in one month counts as two months). DHS will only consider public benefits received on or after [February 24, 2020] for petitions or applications postmarked (or, if applicable, submitted electronically) on or after that date. An alien defined by section 101(a)(15)(V) or 101(a)(15)(U) of the Act may be accorded nonimmigrant status in the United States by following the procedures set forth in 8 CFR 214.15(f) and 214.14, respectively."

8 CFR 214.1(a)(3)(iv) - extension of status

"(iv) Except where the nonimmigrant classification for which the alien seeks to extend is exempt from section 212(a)(4) of the Act or that section has been waived, as a condition for approval of extension of status, the alien must demonstrate that he or she has not received since obtaining the nonimmigrant status he or she seeks to extend one or more public benefits as defined in 8 CFR 212.21(b), for more than 12 months in the aggregate within any 36-month period (such that, for instance, receipt of two benefits in one month counts as two months). For the purposes of this determination, DHS will only consider public benefits received on or after [February 24, 2020] for petitions or applications postmarked (or, if applicable, submitted electronically) on or after that date."

This is a "backward-looking" standard that looks only to whether "since obtaining the nonimmigrant status from which he or she seeks" to change or extend until the date USCIS adjudicates the COS or EOS application, the applicant received "one or more public benefits, as defined at new 8 CFR 212.21(b), "for more than 12 months in the aggregate within any 36-month period" before USCIS adjudicates the COS or EOS application.

USCIS has updated the USCIS Policy Manual Vol. 2, Part A Chapter 4 - Extension of Stay and Change of Status to reflect the COS and EOS public benefits condition.

The revised versions of Form I-539/I-539A and Form I-129 elicit the information USCIS needs to make this determination for COS and EOS applicants. Note that the revised USCIS forms will ask both if the alien has received or is currently certified to receive (by the benefit-granting agency) any of these benefits. The forms will also ask for the date the alien started receiving the benefit, or if certified, the date the alien will start receiving the benefit, and the date the benefit ended or expires. However, the regulatory condition refers only to actual receipt of the listed public benefits. This is the content of the Public Benefits section of the revised 10/15/29 version of Form I-539 (Part 5) and Form I-539A (Part 3). Part 6 of the revised 01/27/20 version of Form I-129 contains the same questions, with minor wording changes that refer to the "beneficiary" rather than "you." Applicants and petitioners must use these versions of the forms if they are postmarked on or after February 24, 2020.

1. Since obtaining the nonimmigrant status that you seek to extend or from which you seek to change, have you received, or are you currently certified to receive, any of the following public benefits? (select all that apply)

  • Yes, I have received or I am currently certified to receive the following public benefits:
    • Any Federal, State, local or tribal cash assistance for income maintenance
    • Supplemental Security Income (SSI)
    • Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)
    • General Assistance (GA)
    • Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly called "Food Stamps")
    • Section 8 Housing Assistance under the Housing Choice Voucher Program
    • Section 8 Project-Based Rental Assistance (including Moderate Rehabilitation)
    • Public Housing under the Housing Act of 1937, 42 u.s.c. 1437 et seq.
    • Federally-Funded Medicaid
  • No, I have not received any of the above listed public benefits.
  • No, I am not certified to receive any of the above listed public benefits.

2. If you have received or are currently certified to receive any of the above public benefits provide information about the public benefits below. If you need extra space to complete this section, use the space provided in Part 9. Additional Information. Submit documentation as outlined in the Instructions.

  • Type of Benefit:
  • Agency That Granted The Benefit:
  • Date You Started Receiving the Benefit or if Certified, Date You Will Start Receiving the Benefit or Date Your Coverage Starts:
  • Date Benefit or Coverage Ended or Expires:

3. If you answered "Yes" to Item Number 1., do any of the following apply to you? (select the applicable box). Provide the evidence listed in the Instructions if any of the following apply to you.

  • I am enlisted in the Armed Forces, or am serving in active duty or in the Ready Reserve Component of the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • I am the spouse or the child of an individual who is enlisted in the Armed Forces, or who is serving in active duty or in the Ready Reserve Component of the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • At the time I received the public benefits, I (or my spouse or parent) was enlisted in the Armed Forces, or was serving in active duty or in the Ready Reserve Component of the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • At the time I received the public benefits, I was present in the United States in a status exempt from the public charge ground of inadmissibility.
  • At the time I received the public benefits, I was present in the United States after being granted a waiver of the public charge ground of inadmissibility.
  • I am a child currently residing abroad who entered the United States with a nonimmigrant visa to attend an N-600K, Application for Citizenship and Issuance of Certificate Under INA Section 322 interview.
  • None of the above statements apply to me.

4.a. Have you received, applied for, or have been certified to receive federally-funded Medicaid in connection with any of the following (select all that apply) (Submit evidence as outlined in the Instructions):

  • An emergency medical condition.
  • For a service under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
  • Other school-based benefits or services available up to the oldest age eligible for secondary education under state law.
  • While you were under the age 21.
  • While you were pregnant or during the 60-day period following the last day of pregnancy.
  • None of the above statements apply to me.

4.b. Provide the applicable dates:

  • From:
  • To:

The instructions to Forms I-539/A and I-129 contain the following note:

"NOTE: You need only to report public benefits received by the beneficiary on or after October 15, 2019 but not any received by the beneficiary before October 15, 2019."

However, because litigation delayed enforcement of the DHS rule until February 24, 2020, "October 15, 2019" should be read to mean "February 24, 2020." A February 24, 2020 USCIS news release clarifies:

"The final rule requires most aliens seeking to extend their nonimmigrant stay or change their nonimmigrant status to show that, since obtaining the nonimmigrant status they seek to extend or change, they have not received public benefits (as defined in the final rule) for more than 12 months, in total, within any 36-month period beginning Oct. 15, 2019. Due to litigation-related delays in the final rule's implementation, DHS is applying this requirement as though it refers to Feb. 24, 2020 rather than Oct. 15, 2019. Therefore, with respect to applying the public benefits condition to applications and petitions for extension of nonimmigrant stay and change of nonimmigrant status, DHS will not consider, and applicants and petitioners need not report an alien's receipt of any public benefits before Feb. 24, 2020."

Although receipt of benefits other than the above or received outside the applicable time frame should not be considered for purposes of the extension of stay condition of 8 CFR 214.1(a)(3)(iv) or the change of status condition of 8 CFR 248.1(a) and 8 CFR 248.1(c), it might affect an adjudicator's overall exercise of discretion. Applicants for change of status and extension of stay should ask an experienced immigration lawyer if they have questions on how to properly complete the form, or if they need advice on their individual situation.

F-1 Reinstatement Applicants

It is unclear to what extent the new public charge rules will apply to F-1 reinstatement applicants. Although the final rule did not amend the F-1 reinstatement regulations, USCIS will likely apply the COS/EOS public benefits condition to reinstatement applicants, since F-1 students also use Form I-539 to apply for reinstatement. USCIS could also consider a reinstatement applicant to be an "applicant for admission," and apply the more burdensome "more likely than not at any time in the future to become a public charge" standard. As with all reinstatement applications, the applicant would do best to retain experienced immigration counsel to represent them in the reinstatement application.

Applicants for Visas, Admission and Applicants for Adjustment of Status

While the public benefits condition that USCIS applies in the context of an application for change or extension of nonimmigrant status is backward-looking, in the following situations DHS and DOS must consider the totality of the circumstances and make a prospective, forward-looking determination of whether someone is likely at any time in the future to become a public charge as defined in 8 CFR 212.21 and 22 CFR 40.41.

The public charge ground of inadmissibility at INA 212(a)(4) [8 USC 1182(a)(4)] provides in general that:

"Any alien who, in the opinion of the consular officer at the time of application for a visa, or in the opinion of the Attorney General at the time of application for admission or adjustment of status, is likely at any time to become a public charge is inadmissible."

DOS will apply this standard to applicants for immigrant visas and to applicants for nonimmigrant visas. However, the Foreign Affairs Manual at at 9 FAM 302.8  instructs consular officers that, "The amount and type of evidence generally required in an IV case is much greater than that which is required in an NIV case. Your determination that an applicant qualifies for the NIV sought is generally sufficient to meet the requirements of INA 212(a)(4), absent evidence that gives you reason to believe that a public charge concern exists...." ("IV" refers to "immigrant visa" and "NIV" refers to "nonimmigrant visas.")

DHS will apply this standard to adjustment of status applicants, as well as to "applicants for admission" to the United States, which includes:

  • Applicants at a port of entry applying for admission to the United States as a nonimmigrant. A CBP officer at a U.S. port of entry usually makes these decisions.
  • New immigrants entering the United States on an immigrant visa. A CBP officer at a U.S. port of entry usually makes these decisions.
  • Lawful permanent residents returning to the United States after an absence of more than 6 months, since they are considered "applicants for admission." A CBP officer at a U.S. port of entry usually makes these decisions.
  • Other individuals who are considered "applicants for admission," including individuals who entered the United States without inspection (EWI). Inadmissibility determinations in these cases are made by DHS officers, with the particular DHS bureau (CBP, ICE, USCIS) depending on the context of DHS's encounter with the individual.

Definitions of "is likely at any time" to become a public charge

DHS regulations at 8 CFR 212.21(c):

(c) Likely at any time to become a public charge. Likely at any time to become a public charge means more likely than not at any time in the future to become a public charge, as defined in 212.21(a), based on the totality of the alien's circumstances.

DOS regulations at 22 CFR 40.41(a):

(a) Basis for determination of ineligibility ... When considering the likelihood of an alien becoming a public charge at any time through receipt of public benefits, as defined in paragraph (c) of this section, consular officers will use a more likely than not standard and take into account the totality of the alien's circumstances at the time of visa application, ...

Totality of the Circumstances

As mandated by the statute, DHS and DOS regulations require that public charge inadmissibility determinations consider at a minimum the alien's:

  • age;
  • health;
  • family status;
  • education and skills; and
  • assets, resources, and financial status.

Detailed provisions at 8 CFR 212.22(b) and 22 CFR 40.41 establish protocols for DHS and DOS officials to weigh each of these factors, as well as "the immigration status that the alien seeks and the expected period of admission as it relates to the alien's ability to financially support for himself or herself during the duration of the alien's stay" (DHS) and "the visa classification sought" (DOS).

For each factor listed at 8 CFR 212.22(b),the DHS regulation specifies a "standard," and also lists the primary types of evidence DHS will consider for the factor under that standard. The DHS rule at 22 CFR 40.41 combines the standard and examples in its provisions.

The DHS and DOS rules also identify positive and negative factors, and "heavily weighted" positive and negative factors, to guide DHS and DOS officers in weighing the factors present in an alien's case. The preamble to the DHS rule and the DOS rule itself clarify that no one enumerated factor alone will create a presumption that the alien is likely to become a public charge, but will focus on "the totality of the circumstances."

  • Example of a heavily weighted negative factor: actual receipt of public benefits, as described in 8 CFR 212.21(b), for more than 12 months in the aggregate within any 36-month period.

  • Example of a heavily weighted positive factor: The alien has private health insurance appropriate for the expected period of admission. Note, however, that health insurance for which the alien receives subsidies in the form of premium tax credits under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act will not constitute a heavily weighted positive factor (although it does not appear to be a negative factor, either).

What about visa applications and inadmissibility/removal proceedings?

In the preamble to its final public charge rule, DHS stated that "DHS is working with DOS to ensure that the Foreign Affairs Manual appropriately reflects the standards in this rule," and that "DOJ plans to conduct rulemaking to ensure that the standards applied in immigration court are consistent with the standards in this rule." DHS explains in the preamble:

"Three different agencies are responsible for applying the public charge ground of inadmissibility, each in a different context or contexts. DHS primarily applies the public charge ground of inadmissibility at ports of entry and when adjudicating certain applications for adjustment of status. This rule amends the standards applicable to those contexts, and also sets forth evidentiary requirements applicable to the adjustment of status context.

DOS Consular officers are responsible for applying the public charge ground of inadmissibility as part of the visa application process and for determining whether a visa applicant is ineligible for a visa on public charge grounds. This rule does not directly revise DOS standards or processes. DHS is working with DOS to ensure that the Foreign Affairs Manual appropriately reflects the standards in this rule.

DOJ is responsible for applying the public charge ground of inadmissibility in immigration court, where DHS may bring and prosecute the charge against certain inadmissible aliens. Immigration judges adjudicate matters in removal proceedings, and the Board of Immigration Appeals and in some cases the Attorney General adjudicate appeals arising from such proceedings. This rule does not directly revise DOJ standards or processes. DHS understands that the DOJ plans to conduct rulemaking to ensure that the standards applied in immigration court are consistent with the standards in this rule."

Also in the preamble to the final rule, DHS clarified that the INA 212(a)(4)/8 USC 1182(a)(4) public charge ground of inadmissibility, which is the subject of this rulemaking, is different from the INA 237/8 USC 1227 public charge ground of deportability, which is not the subject of this DHS rulemaking:

"the INA also contains a separate public charge ground of deportability. This rule does not interpret or change DHS's implementation of the public charge ground of deportability."

Legal Advice

Public charge determinations usually arise in contexts outside the scope of direct international student and scholar advising duties (i.e., in the context of visa applications, adjustment of status, change of status, and extension of stay applications). While understanding the basic factors involved in public charge determinations is helpful, advisers should encourage students, scholars, and their families to consult an experienced immigration lawyer for assistance with their detailed questions and requests for immigration strategy support and representation.